 +_____________________________________________________________________
 ] AUTHOR:            ]     RECONFIGURATION         ] DR:              ]
 ] GEORGE F. SMITH    ]       PROGRAM NOTE          ]  100736          ]
 ]____________________]                             ]__________________]
 ] ORG/PHONE:         ] OPS NOTE ( )  USER NOTE (X) ] DATE:            ]
 ] DP2/X34243         ]      RELEASE NOTE( )        ] MARCH 15, 1991   ]
 ]____________________]_____________________________]__________________]
 ] OI/FLIGHT EFFECTIVITY: OI8D/  ]  USER AFFECTED:                     ]
 ] OI8D/STS-37 RC1, STS-37 FL1   ]  CREW (X)  GROUND (X)  DUMP ONLY ( )]
 ] OI8F/STS-37 RC1               ]                                     ]
 ]_______________________________]_____________________________________]
 ] MAJOR SOFTWARE AREA:    PASS(X) BFS( )] OPS MODES AFFECTED:         ]
 ] SSME**( ) DEU**( ) T&G( ) DFL/FPL**( )]       S2                    ]
 ] TFL**( ) TCS**( ) I-LOAD( ) LEVEL C(X)]                             ]
 ]_____________________________________________________________________]
 ] SOFTWARE SUB-AREA: PAYLOADS                                         ]
 ]_____________________________________________________________________]
 ] PRINCIPAL FUNCTIONS: (JSC-19478-37) 7.5.2                           ]
 ]_____________________________________________________________________]
 ] TITLE: LOWER THAN EXPECTED TEMPERATURES ON SPEC 207 (GRO OPS)       ]
 ]                                                                     ]
 ]_____________________________________________________________________]
 ] DESCRIPTION:                                                        ]
 ]                                                                     ]
 ] DURING FORMAL CITE TESTS WITH PAYLOAD GAMMA RAY OBSERVATORY,        ]
 ] FIFTEEN GRO TEMPERATURE PARAMETERS ON SPEC 207 (P52T0017A THRU      ]
 ] P52T0029A, P52T0064A AND P52T0065A) HAD VALUES THAT WERE LOWER      ]
 ] THAN EXPECTED BY GRO/GODDARD SPACE FLIGHT CENTER.  THE RESULTS      ]
 ] MATCHED THE 3RD ORDER CURVE DEFINED IN THE CURRENT REQUIREMENTS;    ]
 ] HOWEVER, THE GRO ENGINEERS HAD PROVIDED INACCURATE INPUTS TO THE    ]
 ] REQUIREMENTS DOCUMENT.                                              ]
 ]                                                                     ]
 ]_____________________________________________________________________]
 ] USER RESPONSE:                                                      ]
 ]                                                                     ]
 ] THE CALIBRATION COEFFICIENTS OF FIFTEEN MEASUREMENTS WERE           ]
 ] INCORRECTLY PROVIDED BY THE PAYLOAD CUSTOMER.  THE FOLLOWING HAS    ]
 ] BEEN DONE TO CORRECT THE PROBLEM: (1) GSFC HAS PROVIDED P/L OPS     ]
 ] WITH 255 DATA POINTS/CURVE FOR 3 CURVES;  (2) P/L OPS GENERATED     ]
 ] CHARTS SHOWING DISPLAYED VALUES VS. TRUE VALUES AS SEEN BY THE      ]
 ] POCC;  (3) EXPECTED TEMPERATURE RANGES LISTED IN THE FLIGHT DATA    ]
 ] FILE (FDF) HAVE BEEN MODIFIED TO REFLECT VALUES AS CALCULATED BY    ]
 ] FLIGHT SOFTWARE;  (4) THE USERS SHOULD BE AWARE OF THIS PROBLEM,    ]
 ] BUT THE POCC HAS  THE FINAL RESPONSIBILITY.                         ]
 ]                                                                     ]
 ]_____________________________________________________________________]
 ]CONCURRENCE:                           ]APPROVAL:                    ]
 ]RSOC: SILVIA WERRE        DATE 03/19/91]                             ]
 ]     -------------------      ---------]                             ]
 ]MOD: MICHAEL J. JONES     DATE 03/19/91]                             ]
 ]    --------------------      ---------] DARRELL E. STAMPER 03/25/91 ]
 ]SW MGR: CHARLES STROUGH   DATE 03/22/91]------------------- -------- ]
 ]       -----------------      ---------] CHAIRMAN, SASCB      DATE   ]
 ]_______________________________________]_____________________________]
 @

